
Quality Through Access, Access
with Quality:
The New Imperative for Higher Education
![]()
| Book review | According to Alan Mandell and Xenia Coulter from SUNY Empire
State College, education was an integral part of the movement for social change in the
1960s and early 1970s. At every level of schooling, critical reflection on how subjects
were taught, how students learn, and the social context in which all education occurs,
deeply engaged the attention of the Academy. These thoughts stimulated educational
experiments for a growing body of adult learners. New curricula were tried out; new
programs within existing schools were developed; new collaborations among institutions
were explored; and a number of new institutions were created (such as the University of
Phoenix) from the ground up. Now, many years later, some of the ideals that animated this important movement are still relevant However, a great number of external pressures--economic realities, globalization, the explosion of information, and the overall homogenization of culturehave either destroyed or re-formed many of these initiatives for change. Within some institutions, other pressures--new faculty with different priorities, workload worries about professional identity, external suspicions about academic credibility, and the routinization of what was once novelalso threaten the vibrancy of those ideals. Amazon.Com addresses the issue as follows: " In his book, Quality Through Access, Access With Quality : The New Imperative for Higher Education William H. Bergquist draws on thirty years of experience in both traditional and nontraditional colleges and universities to take a provocative look at the often tense interplay between the objectives of quality and access in American higher education. Quality without access, Bergquist argues, is untenable in light of today's diverse student populations, just as access without quality is sham education.Bergquist begins by showing how traditional definitions of
quality, which tend to reflect the world of four-year residential colleges and
universities, fail to embrace the realities of today's commuter students, returning
adults, and multicultural populations." Such problems and concernsthough they
may take different formsare undoubtedly common to many, if not all nontraditional
colleges. Indeed, these issues will always permeate educational institutions that attempt
to stand against or apart from the methods and assumptions of traditional education.
Learning about how we address these challenges, only infrequently acknowledged as major
issues for nontraditional institutions, is one of the goals of this conversation. From
this discussion might emerge broad principles and common practices that can be helpful to
all of us. In this way, we may broaden the meaning of quality and access, particularly as
it relates to the missions of adult nontraditional degree programs. |
| Table of contents | 1. Higher Education in the Postmodern
Environment 2. Challenges to Contemporary Colleges and Universities 3. Redefining Quality in the Context of Access 4. Myths and Concerns About Integrating Quality and Access 5. The Elitist Perspective 6. The Populist Perspective 7. The Beleaguered Perspective 8. The Expedient Perspective 9. Strategies Based on Creativity, Commitment, and Cooperation10. Institutional Approaches to Managing Quality and Access 11. Critical Roles for Campus Leaders |
| William H. Bergquist Hardcover - 308
pages 1 Ed edition (April 1995) Jossey-Bass Publishers; ISBN: 0787900710 |
<< Back to Table of Contents <<
Copyright © 1997-2000, University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.